• blog
  • Services
  • Contact
  • About
Menu

panos.blog

  • blog
  • Services
  • Contact
  • About

Lexus NX300, Part 1

January 5, 2019

Hey Lexus ...

have you done your driver distraction, user testing, duty of care ?

My user experience of the Lexus infotainment , Part 1

I believe that destination entry should be allowed only when the car is stationary (as per Android Auto).

Part 2 of the study will include data on voice interaction, but voice could not be an excuse for poor execution of other interaction methods.

Data collection and analysis are from a personal study, if there are any data from controlled experiments, please share

Many thanks to Scott Hodgins and Jon Ward at Tobii Pro

In automotive, driver distraction, eye tracking, HMI, infotainment
← Mercedes A-Class, Part 1Volvo XC60, Part 1 →

Latest Posts

Featured
Jun 15, 2025
Every millimetre counts
Jun 15, 2025
Jun 15, 2025
Jun 8, 2025
Ford Explorer & Capri: Driving Pleasure, UX Pain
Jun 8, 2025
Jun 8, 2025
Dec 1, 2024
New Audi Q6: A Design Decision That Raises Serious Concerns
Dec 1, 2024
Dec 1, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
A Unified Approach for EU Automakers: Standardising Vehicle Interfaces
Nov 14, 2024
Nov 14, 2024
Oct 18, 2024
The Importance of HMI Strategy: Decisions That Stick for Years
Oct 18, 2024
Oct 18, 2024
Sep 27, 2024
Usability always wins
Sep 27, 2024
Sep 27, 2024
Sep 7, 2024
The Renault 5 E-Tech Electric: Probably the Coolest Model Rebirth
Sep 7, 2024
Sep 7, 2024
May 24, 2024
Is Another Benchmarking Session Really What Your UX Needs?
May 24, 2024
May 24, 2024
May 17, 2024
From Trucks to Cars: The Impact of Camera Monitoring Systems (CMS)
May 17, 2024
May 17, 2024
Apr 25, 2024
Automotive Pioneers: Why Rivian Matters
Apr 25, 2024
Apr 25, 2024